Chronicle article: Redefining Myself on a Seven-Course Load

altany@email.wcu.edu
Date: 10/29/02

  • Next message: altany@email.wcu.edu: "Chronicle article: An E-Mail List for Tomorrow's Professor"

    This article from The Chronicle of Higher Education
    (http://chronicle.com) was forwarded to you from:

      altany@email.wcu.edu

    _________________________________________________________________

    This article is available online at this address:

    http://chronicle.com/jobs/2002/10/2002102901c.htm

                  - The text of the article is below -
    _________________________________________________________________

    Finding it hard to keep up with all that's happening in academe?
    The Chronicle's e-mailed Daily Report keeps you up-to-date in a
    matter of minutes by quickly summarizing current events in higher
    education while providing links to complete coverage on our
    subscriber-only Web site. The Daily Report and Web access come
    with your Chronicle subscription at no extra cost. Order your
    subscription now at http://chronicle.com/4free?es
    _________________________________________________________________

      Tuesday, October 29, 2002

      Redefining Myself on a Seven-Course Load

      By JAMES M. LANG
      
       As far as I can tell, all academics share a common
      dissatisfaction with their job: Everyone believes they would
      be happier if they had a lighter teaching load.
      
      I have known people who taught five courses a semester at
      community colleges, and I certainly empathized with their
      desire for a lighter teaching load. But I have also known
      people at research universities who taught two courses a
      semester, and they also whiled away their Sunday afternoons
      dreaming of a lighter teaching load.
      
      I am no exception to this rule.
      
      At the liberal-arts college where I am on the tenure track in
      the English department, we teach three courses in one
      semester, and four courses in the next. In my third year now,
      I have learned to live happily with my three-course semester.
      During the fall, when I have the lighter teaching load, I can
      find time both to write and to live my life outside of the
      college -- go to the dentist, get the oil changed, take the
      kids swimming once a week.
      
      I have not yet learned to live happily with teaching four
      courses in a semester, and I don't expect to anytime soon. As
      a committed writer, one who generally will log anywhere from 5
      to 20 hours a week at my desk -- depending upon whether I have
      papers to grade -- I hate and resent the fact that I can find
      almost no time to write during the spring semester, when I
      teach four courses. I also tend to feel like my personal life
      gets put on hold in the spring semester -- no dentist, no oil
      change, no swimming.
      
      Life would be just perfect, I tell myself for those three
      months out of the year, if only I had three courses in both
      semesters.
      
      Of course, I suspect that people who teach three courses a
      semester imagine that they will be really happy only when they
      have two courses in one semester, and three in the other.
      
      But still, I can dream.
      
      The longing for a lighter teaching load, though, has been
      tempered for me in the last year or two by a growing
      appreciation of one benefit of working at a teaching
      institution like mine: the flexibility this institution offers
      me in how I define myself as both a teacher and a scholar.
      
      The job ad to which I responded three years ago sought a
      specialist in (among other possible areas) contemporary
      British literature, and that was the field in which I had done
      my academic research and publishing. I came in and immediately
      began teaching courses in contemporary British fiction and
      British postcolonial literature.
      
      But even as my reading and teaching in these areas continued,
      my interest in writing academic scholarship about them began
      to wane. Spurred in part by the columns I had begun to write
      for The Chronicle, I became increasingly interested in writing
      creative nonfiction and memoir.
      
      During my first and second years on the tenure track I spent
      most of my writing time working on just such a book, a memoir
      titled Learning Sickness: A Year with Crohn's Disease, which
      found its way into the hands of an agent this summer who
      assures me that we will sell it to a commercial publisher.
      
      Working on that book has been the most satisfying intellectual
      experience of my life, and perhaps my greatest professional
      accomplishment. The promise of a successful writing career,
      something about which I have been dreaming since eighth grade,
      has been the most exciting new stage in my life since the
      birth of my first child nearly seven years ago.
      
      Were I at a research university, though, and had I been hired
      there as a scholar of contemporary British literature, that
      book would likely prove meaningless in my case for tenure. If
      anything, it would probably hurt me: The time I took to write
      this piece of creative nonfiction was time away from potential
      scholarship in my field.
      
      Here the story is quite different. I have asked a variety of
      faculty members and administrators about the value of my book,
      and have been assured that it will most certainly count toward
      the college's expectations for their faculty members to write
      and publish. One faculty member, who spent the last year on
      the tenure and evaluations committee, told me that, if he were
      considering my tenure case, he would make no distinction
      between the book I had written and a book of academic
      scholarship.
      
      This may sound irresponsible to some -- shouldn't faculty
      members produce scholarship in their fields? But one other
      piece of information is important to know here.
      
      While I was working on this book, I have also been working on
      developing credentials in this new field as both a teacher and
      scholar. I have been writing and publishing creative
      nonfiction aimed at journals and periodicals that specialize
      in or feature the genre. I have supervised two independent
      studies with senior undergraduates in advanced creative
      nonfiction.
      
      And, perhaps most importantly, I proposed, developed, and
      taught the college's first writing seminar in creative
      nonfiction last year. I'll teach it again in the spring.
      
      So I now count creative nonfiction as one of my two major
      fields, along with postwar British literature. And it is in
      this new area that I will submit publications for both my
      third-year review and my tenure case.
      
      I am not the only one at this college, or even in this
      department, who has redefined himself in this manner. One of
      the members of my department, who wrote his dissertation on
      Old English poetry, is now our specialist in modern Irish
      literature. Another, who wrote her dissertation on Victorian
      fiction, now teaches our courses in 20th-century
      African-American literature. Our chairman did his M.F.A. work
      in fiction, and wrote his dissertation about contemporary
      American fiction; he recently completed his first book of
      poetry.
      
      They would certainly all agree with me that one of the joys of
      teaching at a college like ours -- heavy courseload and all --
      is the flexibility we have in defining ourselves as both
      teachers and scholars.
      
      Many readers of these pages are looking through the job ads
      right now, and are searching for positions in the specialized
      areas in which their graduate-school careers have defined
      their interests. And many of those job seekers begin their
      search looking for the light teaching loads and writing time
      offered to them by the sort of research universities that are
      awarding them their degrees.
      
      I would encourage those readers to think hard about how they
      are defining themselves through their research: Will the topic
      hold your interest for a lifetime of academic scholarship?
      Will it hold your interest for even the six years until
      tenure?
      
      If you're not certain about the answer, take another look at
      those job ads. Don't let the slightly higher teaching loads
      scare you away.
      
      At a college like this one, the teaching load may be heavier,
      but the chains that can define and constrict your writing and
      publishing selves are much lighter.
      
      
      
      James M. Lang is an assistant professor of English at
      Assumption College in Worcester, Mass. He has written
      occasionally this academic year about his experiences on the
      tenure track in the humanities.
      
      
      

    _________________________________________________________________

    You may visit The Chronicle as follows:

       http://chronicle.com

    _________________________________________________________________
    Copyright by The Chronicle of Higher Education

    ------------------------------------------------------------newfaculty-+

    You have received this message because you are subscribed to this mailing list. If you wish to be removed from this list, please send an email (in PLAIN TEXT) to:
            listproc@lists.wcu.edu

    Leave your subject line blank and in the body of the message, type:
            unsub NEWFACULTY

    Or, you may choose to send an email to (a real human being): listmgr@lists.wcu.edu.

    ------------------------------------------------------------newfaculty--



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 10/29/02 EST