Chronicle article: Student 'Engagement' in Learning Varies Significantly by Major, Survey Finds

altany@email.wcu.edu
Date: 11/10/03

  • Next message: altany@email.wcu.edu: "Chronicle article: Grading on My Nerves"

    This article from The Chronicle of Higher Education
    (http://chronicle.com) was forwarded to you from:

      altany@email.wcu.edu

    _________________________________________________________________

    This article is available online at this address:

    http://chronicle.com/weekly/v50/i12/12a03701.htm

                  - The text of the article is below -
    _________________________________________________________________

    Finding it hard to keep up with all that's happening in academe?
    The Chronicle's e-mailed Daily Report keeps you up-to-date in a
    matter of minutes by quickly summarizing current events in higher
    education while providing links to complete coverage on our
    subscriber-only Web site. The Daily Report and Web access come
    with your Chronicle subscription at no extra cost. Order your
    subscription now at http://chronicle.com/4free?es
    _________________________________________________________________

      From the issue dated November 14, 2003

      Student 'Engagement' in Learning Varies Significantly by
      Major, Survey Finds

      By JEFFREY R. YOUNG

         The amount of quality time that students spend with their
      professors varies significantly, depending on a student's
      major. Nationwide, business students report the least contact
      with faculty members, while chemistry students report the most
      student-faculty interaction.
      
      Those are among the major findings of the latest National
      Survey of Student Engagement (http://www.indiana.edu/~nsse/).
      In its fourth year, the survey -- known as "Nessie," after its
      acronym, NSSE -- covered 145,000 freshmen and seniors at 437
      four-year colleges in the spring of 2003.
      
      By measuring "engagement" -- how involved students are in the
      material they study and in the learning process itself -- the
      survey's organizers hope to provide a better measure of an
      institution's quality than is offered by popular rankings,
      like those of U.S. News & World Report.
      
      A national summary of the results was released this week. Data
      on individual colleges are not publicly released.
      Participating colleges receive detailed reports about their
      students' performance and how it compares with that at other
      colleges, but many institutions refuse to release those
      findings. That secrecy has drawn complaints from critics ever
      since the survey began. For their part, college administrators
      hope they can use their results to make changes that will
      improve student engagement, although there is little evidence
      that such changes have occurred.
      
      Technology's 'Disturbing' Impact
      
      In general, national averages did not vary significantly from
      previous surveys, says George D. Kuh, director of the survey,
      who is a professor of higher education at Indiana University
      at Bloomington.
      
      Mr. Kuh says the biggest surprises came from 18 new questions
      about the impact of technology on learning. These questions
      were asked only of the 60,000 students who filled out the
      survey online. Of them, 87 percent said their peers had copied
      and pasted material from the Internet into their academic
      papers without proper attribution at least "sometimes." He
      called that finding "more than mildly disturbing."
      
      Eighty percent said their professors require them to use the
      Internet for assignments, and 62 percent said they frequently
      use e-mail to clarify assignments with professors. Mr. Kuh
      says those findings suggest that technology is improving
      student engagement.
      
      The survey shows that students who participate in athletics
      are at least as engaged in academics as others are. What's
      more, freshman athletes are more likely to participate in
      "active and collaborative learning" than their classmates.
      "This goes against the so-called 'dumb jock' notion," says Mr.
      Kuh.
      
      Students at women's colleges are generally more engaged than
      are students at other institutions, according to the survey.
      Students at women's colleges report more interaction with
      professors, more active and collaborative learning, and
      greater levels of academic challenges than students elsewhere
      do. Women at all institutions are typically more engaged than
      men are, the survey found.
      
      When it comes to grades, 41 percent of freshmen and seniors
      reported earning mostly A's, and 42 percent said they earned
      grades of mostly B or B+. Only 3 percent of students said they
      get mostly C's or lower.
      
      Some colleges have significantly lower indicators of
      engagement than others. The survey report broke down the
      collective performance of the 5 percent of colleges ranked at
      the top, along with the national averages. For instance, 58
      percent of students nationwide said they discussed readings
      outside of class either often or very often; among colleges in
      the top 5 percent on that item, the proportion was 68 percent.
      
      About 1,300 students who took the NSSE survey in 2000 were
      asked to take the survey again this year, which gave colleges
      the chance to see how those students' experiences have changed
      now that they are seniors. The students interacted more with
      professors than they did as freshmen, they contributed
      slightly more to class discussions, and they wrote more long
      papers and gave more presentations than they had earlier. But
      they also reported spending fewer hours per week studying than
      when they were freshmen, and had fewer assigned readings.
      
      Pilot Test for Professors
      
      For the first time, professors on some campuses were asked to
      give their views on their students' level of engagement -- a
      pilot test of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement, which
      is to be conducted nationwide next year. About 14,000 faculty
      members at 143 four-year colleges participated in the
      experiment. On average, professors expected freshmen to spend
      5.6 hours per week preparing for each class, though freshmen
      said they spend only 3.4 hours per week doing so.
      
      Eighty-five percent of the professors in the pilot study
      reported that they encouraged students to use computers in
      their academic work either "quite a bit" or "very much," while
      only 16 percent said they do so "some" or "very little" of the
      time. Forty-eight percent of the professors said they never
      worked with undergraduates on research, while 38 percent said
      they did so for one to four hours per week.
      
      John N. Gardner, executive director of the Policy Center on
      the First Year of College at Brevard College, in North
      Carolina, says being able to compare the perceptions of
      professors to those of students should produce powerful
      insights in years ahead -- and not all of them positive for
      professors, who are asked how long they spend preparing for
      their classes.
      
      "I suspect there are going to be a lot of red faces on this,"
      says Mr. Gardner. "We're not used to this kind of external
      scrutiny, especially that compares our behavior teaching."
      
      But are the survey results leading to reform on campuses?
      
      The survey's organizers point to a few colleges that have made
      changes based on Nessie data, like improving
      student-orientation programs. But most institutions are still
      working to inform their constituencies about their campus's
      results.
      
      At Oregon State University, Rebecca A. Sanderson, director of
      student-affairs research and evaluation, says she has
      presented what she calls her "NSSE dog-and-pony show" to at
      least 25 campus groups in the past year, based on the results
      of last year's survey. She says she has not had time to see
      how the university did on this year's survey.
      
      "Some have been quite surprised by the results and kind of
      mystified," she says. "One surprising piece was the sense that
      students didn't feel as supported on campus as we would like
      them to feel," despite a number of orientation and service
      options offered by the university.
      
      "It has certainly spurred some invigorating conversation," she
      adds. "I think it has brought some things up to the surface
      that sparked other conversations that may lead to some
      changes."
      
      Oregon State officials also shared the data with a group of 17
      freshmen and asked them what they would do to improve student
      engagement. The students, who are on a committee called
      Student Leaders of Positive Innovation, presented their
      thoughts to a group of senior administrators in May. Among
      their suggestions: Reduce class sizes in required writing
      classes, encourage professors to hold more office hours, and
      improve academic advising.
      
      So far only one of the students' suggestions has led to a new
      policy -- the housing department plans to make changing rooms
      in midyear more difficult, says Larry Roper, vice president
      for student affairs.
      
      Mr. Gardner, however, says the survey has helped remind
      college leaders to think about what students are getting out
      of college.
      
      "Before the NSSE, the concept of engagement was not deeply
      rooted in the thought process of the academy," he says. "But
      it is now. NSSE is being used in the whole process of taking
      assessment more seriously."

    _________________________________________________________________

    You may visit The Chronicle as follows:

       http://chronicle.com

    _________________________________________________________________
    Copyright 2003 by The Chronicle of Higher Education

    ------------------------------------------------------------newfaculty-+

    You have received this message because you are subscribed to this mailing list. If you wish to be removed from this list, please send an email (in PLAIN TEXT) to:
            listproc@lists.wcu.edu

    Leave your subject line blank and in the body of the message, type:
            unsub NEWFACULTY

    Or, you may choose to send an email to (a real human being): listmgr@lists.wcu.edu.

    ------------------------------------------------------------newfaculty--



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 11/10/03 EST